Does anyone else find this amusing?

I think it's natural that we are seeing G3 ponies reincarnated as G4s.

If you think about it, G4 came directly after G3(.5); a generation that had been building character recognition for 5+ years. Nearly all of the Core 7 characters were reincarnated in MLP:FiM's Mane 6 and CMC. Skywishes and Minty were featured prominently in G3 animated features. From a marketing perspective, it makes complete and total sense to re-use characters that already have fairly strong recognition within the brand. I think this is the real reason we didn't see a return to classic G1 characters beyond Applejack and Spike (who, to be fair, was also in G3 movies as well as the live-action stage show): it would have been too risky. Why introduce completely "new" characters the existing customer base doesn't know about when there are already characters they know and love?

The My Little Pony brand changed abruptly over the course of a single year; a huge departure from what defined it in 2003 when G3 began. Continuing to use the same (G3) characters consumers are familiar with provided a smoother transition between the generations, and has the bonus effect of extending the life of the previous generations' goods just a little bit longer. In other words, by re-purposing G3 characters, Hasbro is using the loyalty of its fans to ensure the brand's popularity from the start and avoided shooting itself in the foot in terms of being able to sell off still-somewhat-relevant old stock.

Remember, as much as we'd like it to be true, by and large we collectors are NOT the main market Hasbro is catering to, and it would be arrogant to think otherwise. True, the brony demographic is kind of throwing things for a loop, but I do believe when Hasbro was planning the new line, they were thinking in terms of the majority of pony and pony-licensed merchandise purchases being made by parents of young children. It's easy to forget, but young children are not always the pony connoisseurs that we are as adults! The typical parent doesn't tend to be, either ;)

I feel like I might be repeating myself, that I might have posted a similar thought in some other thread. If I have, I apologize; but I really do believe this is why we have seen the G4 toy line form the way it has.
 
I think it's natural that we are seeing G3 ponies reincarnated as G4s.

If you think about it, G4 came directly after G3(.5); a generation that had been building character recognition for 5+ years. Nearly all of the Core 7 characters were reincarnated in MLP:FiM's Mane 6 and CMC. Skywishes and Minty were featured prominently in G3 animated features. From a marketing perspective, it makes complete and total sense to re-use characters that already have fairly strong recognition within the brand. I think this is the real reason we didn't see a return to classic G1 characters beyond Applejack and Spike (who, to be fair, was also in G3 movies as well as the live-action stage show): it would have been too risky. Why introduce completely "new" characters the existing customer base doesn't know about when there are already characters they know and love?

The My Little Pony brand changed abruptly over the course of a single year; a huge departure from what defined it in 2003 when G3 began. Continuing to use the same (G3) characters consumers are familiar with provided a smoother transition between the generations, and has the bonus effect of extending the life of the previous generations' goods just a little bit longer. In other words, by re-purposing G3 characters, Hasbro is using the loyalty of its fans to ensure the brand's popularity from the start and avoided shooting itself in the foot in terms of being able to sell off still-somewhat-relevant old stock.

Remember, as much as we'd like it to be true, by and large we collectors are NOT the main market Hasbro is catering to, and it would be arrogant to think otherwise. True, the brony demographic is kind of throwing things for a loop, but I do believe when Hasbro was planning the new line, they were thinking in terms of the majority of pony and pony-licensed merchandise purchases being made by parents of young children. It's easy to forget, but young children are not always the pony connoisseurs that we are as adults! The typical parent doesn't tend to be, either ;)

I feel like I might be repeating myself, that I might have posted a similar thought in some other thread. If I have, I apologize; but I really do believe this is why we have seen the G4 toy line form the way it has.


I completly understand that! I see the practicality of it all, and I'm not against Hasbro reusing names. It makes perfect sense to reuse a name, and in a business aimed for children, you constantly need to change your product for the aging, growing, changing, consumers. When the last group of kids move on from My Little Pony, newer, younger generations or new fans come in, and the company will need to be catering to their likes.

But as a collector who is very involved in ponies' stories and feelings, I love to make connections like this. I wrote a short paper one day this summer called:

"Pinkie's Theory".
It's my connection to My Little Pony and evolution, history, government, and everything else to make complete sense of every generation realistically and logically. (I apologise if I am offending anyone's religoin with my Darwinistic ideas)

It starts with My Pretty Pony, who was at first large and brown. Natural selection favored the Ponies who showed the recessive trait of pigmented fur and hair. Smaller Ponies seemed to survive more easily, espeically during the winter, when food was scarce and larger ponies demanded more vegitation to survive. Therefore, Ponies became smaller and more flashy.

I go on to explain the splitting of Ponygea (that's pangea in ponyland!), and how it forced the ponies to adapt to new environments. A volcanic eruption on an island forced some to escape to the sea, and some to dwell in higher places, creating sea & pegasus ponies.

The unicorns came from a mutation. An earth pony was born with a misshapen skull deformity, where some of his brain had grown into. Nerves from the brain branched into the hollow tube in his skull, opening up an unused section of brain to function. No other pony could use this part of the brain that enabled telekenisis. This ability was vital to his survival, and as he reproduced, the trait was passed on and soon created a new race.

It gets rather complex, but I explain the monarchy of Ponyland and how, at first, there was no rulers, causing chaos and foreign invaders (Rescue at Midnight Castle). I explain it all while staying true to the pony stories and plotlines we all love. I found this all rather fun to connect Ponies to science, and Princess Ponies to politics. It definatly gives adults a whole new reason to love MLP.


If anyone wants to read "Pinkie's Theory" I can scan the document. It is all neatly handwritten on lined paper. Maybe one day I'll have someone type it for me when I'm not busy.
 
I love it, that's as sound a theory as I ever heard! I can tell you really put a lot of time and effort into it! Also, idk if I'm the only one who does this, but I always mis-read Waterfire as Firewater and have a giggle about the booze pony every time! :)
 
I love it, that's as sound a theory as I ever heard! I can tell you really put a lot of time and effort into it! Also, idk if I'm the only one who does this, but I always mis-read Waterfire as Firewater and have a giggle about the booze pony every time! :)


Thank you! :) haha, I've never thought of it that way! Now I'm going to have a giggle about her name too! ;l her pose totally works for a booze pony...the expression! XD
 
Back
Top